Source Linked Questions. Attorney Controlled Decisions.

Controlled Pilot

Move from reviewed evidence to possible issues without losing the reasoning chain.

Connect attorney accepted findings to research questions, possible pathways, authorities, uncertainty, reviewed drafts, and attorney controlled approval.

Book it. Build it. Sell it. Run it. Capture it. Share it.

Open the appRequest a written scopeBrowse products and services

Issue Spotter · Video Explainer

Keep the Question Beside the Source.

Artificial intelligence can raise a question. It cannot accept a fact, choose a legal theory, or exercise an attorney’s judgment.

Strategic Communication and Innovation Designed by Julie Good, MATC · Good Creative Media · San Antonio, Texas

Legal Issue Spotting Software: Source-Linked Attorney Review With IMC Machine

See attorney-accepted findings remain beside their sources while AI-assisted observations become clearly labeled questions and possible research pathways—not conclusions.

Watch on YouTube

Issue Spotter is a controlled legal pilot. It is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and does not replace counsel. Attorneys control factual findings, research, interpretation, strategy, filing, and delivery.

Current Issue Spotter application surface
Current IMC Machine application surface. Individual functions carry their own maturity, provider, access, and approval requirements. Open the full size application screen.

The Problem It Solves

The event record should not disappear between systems.

Legal Casework and Evidence Suite

Legal review tools often begin with text. The event at the center of the matter may be an MP4 of an arrest, an audio call, a sequence of photographs, or a handwritten report whose account must be compared with the recording. When media, transcript, report, chronology, issue, motion path, and attorney decision live separately, the reasoning chain becomes difficult to inspect.

Complete Workflow

Move from source to approved outcome.

Legal Casework and Evidence Suite

  1. Create the matter and authorized intake record with source, custodian, dates, file identity, access, deadlines, and handling instructions.
  2. Preserve and normalize supported video, audio, image, PDF, email, and scanned document inputs without replacing the original.
  3. Transcribe, describe, index, time mark, compare, and organize material for human review.
  4. Record possible issues, contradictions, missing items, recommended clips, legal research questions, and confidence or uncertainty.
  5. Require the investigator, paralegal, attorney, or other authorized reviewer to accept, reject, correct, and approve every consequential finding.
  6. Prepare controlled reports, worksheets, exhibits, packets, or draft work product with source links, versions, approval, and audit history.

What The User Gets

Useful work, visible responsibility, and a record worth keeping.

User outcomes

  1. Media centered review that does not reduce the recorded event to an orphaned transcript.
  2. Findings traceable to exact source material and reviewer decisions.
  3. Faster navigation across large mixed format evidence sets.
  4. Court ready preparation that preserves uncertainty, correction, attorney judgment, and approval.

Examples and samples

  1. A criminal defense team reviews arrest video, dispatch audio, photographs, reports, and discovery against one synchronized chronology.
  2. A civil matter organizes email, contracts, photographs, recordings, pleadings, dates, and disputed facts for attorney review.
  3. An attorney compares a written report with time marked body camera observations and accepts only verified findings.
  4. A firm prepares an approved evidence report, selected clips, source list, issue worksheet, and draft motion path without allowing generated text to become final legal work.

Visual Workflow

Issue Spotter from source to approved outcome.

Follow the practical movement of the work. The machine organizes, drafts, compares, and prepares. The responsible person keeps authority over approval and release.

Issue Spotter workflow separating source linked facts, AI questions, attorney research, attorney judgment, reviewed drafts, filings, referrals, and the reasoning record
Issue Spotter. Attorney accepted findings lead to source linked questions, possible pathways, research, uncertainty, attorney judgment, reviewed drafts, filing or referral decisions, and the preserved reasoning chain. Open the full size workflow. Open this workflow in Figma.

Evidence And Boundaries

Show what is current. Name what still requires people, providers, or a managed scope.

  1. Public and authenticated surfaces document Evidence Orchestrator, multi format intake, evidence cockpit, recommended clips, chronology, transcription, metadata, Issue Spotter, dismissal pathways, draft document workflows, three model review concepts, and attorney approval ceremonies.
  2. This suite is a controlled Pilot. Every factual finding, legal issue, quotation, citation, exhibit, motion, filing, and client communication requires authorized human verification and attorney approval.
  3. The suite does not promise legal advice, automatic dismissal, universal court filing, complete chain of custody, or fitness for a specific matter without a written pilot protocol.

This is a controlled legal pilot. It does not provide legal advice. Every factual finding, legal issue, quotation, authority, filing, and client communication requires authorized human verification and attorney approval.

Connected product areas

Evidence OrchestratorIssue SpotterContracts and RightsTrustSecurityServices and Catalog

Read. Compare. Decide.

The website should do the explaining.

Review the actual application surface, the complete workflow, the practical outcomes, and the maturity boundary. Then open the application, browse the catalog, or request a written scope.

Book it. Build it. Sell it. Run it. Capture it. Share it.

Open the appExplore all productsRequest a written scope